• Home
  • |
  • Blog
  • |
  • The FNB Bank Lawsuit: Alleged Redlining and Racial Discrimination Scandal

February 7, 2024

The FNB Bank Lawsuit: Alleged Redlining and Racial Discrimination Scandal

• FNB Corporation, a Pennsylvania-based bank, is being sued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) for alleged racial discrimination in its mortgage lending practices in North Carolina.
• The issues date back to FNB’s 2017 acquisition of Yadkin Bank in an all-stock deal reportedly worth $1.8 billion.
• The DOJ alleges that post-acquisition, FNB engaged in a practice known as “redlining”. This supposedly involved drawing a “red line” around neighborhoods with majority-Black and Hispanic populations and dodging mortgage lending in those areas.
• According to the lawsuit, FNB intentionally avoided placing branches, providing services or marketing in such majority-minority neighborhoods, resulting in fewer mortgages for these underrepresented communities.
• The fines and remedies linked to these discrimination charges could substantially impact FNB’s financial standing.

The Comedic Corruption Controversy of FNB

Banking Blooper or Biased Business?

Is it Redlining or Just Colour Blind?

In the world of real estate, there’s nothing funnier than a multi-billion dollar bank being accused of acting like a snobby adolescent refusing to associate with the “uncool” kids. By uncool, we mean Black and Hispanic communities, and by snobby adolescent, we mean FNB Corporation. Apparently, when FNB pocketed Yadkin Bank for a cool $1.8 billion in 2017, they may have also got themselves a coupon for a DOJ lawsuit. Talk about buyer’s remorse!

According to our friendly neighbours at the Department of Justice, FNB may have been engaging in a Banksy-style act of boundary drawing, ‘redlining’ around minority-majority neighbourhoods. They allegedly prevented their mortgage magic from spreading into those areas. You know, like a fairy godmother, but only granting wishes in select areas.

Now, FNB is not new on the block. But with these allegations, they seem to be modelling the “Avoid the Other Side of The Tracks” strategy right out of the Monopoly rulebook. Let’s just say, Park Place and Boardwalk don’t look quite as inviting with this scandalous cloud hanging over them.

Consequences are looming and the numbers crunched could see a significant shake-up to FNB’s piggybank. But hey, with several billion dollars at their disposal, perhaps they can buy a “Get Out of Jail Free” card… or maybe they misjudged the rules of real-life monopoly?

Hot take: In the uproarious circus of banking shenanigans, FNB is making a valiant attempt to secure the spotlight. With a DOJ lawsuit looming and residents raising eyebrows, it’s safe to say it’s not quite the standing ovation they might’ve been hoping for. So, here’s to hoping FNB finds its moral compass and starts distributing its fairy dust evenly across the lands—or at least learns to play by the rules before they land on “Go to Jail”… this is one Monopoly game where there’s no fun in cheating!

Original article: https://www.inman.com/2024/02/06/fnb-of-pennsylvania-to-pay-13-5m-to-settle-redlining-allegations/

Related Posts

Real Estate Gets Real: Warren Buffett’s Company Accused of Abusing Trust, Nurturing Price-Fixing Conspiracy

Real Estate Gets Real: Warren Buffett’s Company Accused of Abusing Trust, Nurturing Price-Fixing Conspiracy

Real Estate Power Play: Kathy Kaye and Lorraine Baker Join The Corcoran Group

Real Estate Power Play: Kathy Kaye and Lorraine Baker Join The Corcoran Group

Suburban Multifamily Housing: The New Real Estate Rockstar

Suburban Multifamily Housing: The New Real Estate Rockstar

Eclipse Mania Boosts Short-Term Rentals: Real Estate Market Experiences Astronomical Shift

Eclipse Mania Boosts Short-Term Rentals: Real Estate Market Experiences Astronomical Shift

Martin Towers


Martin is an ex Real Estate Agent turned digital marketer and entrepreneur now specialising in helping Realtors all around the world

Your Signature

Leave a Reply


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked

{"email":"Email address invalid","url":"Website address invalid","required":"Required field missing"}