The Lowdown on Le’ Sitzer | Burnett Verdict
Key Points
- A federal court judge put their foot down and denied a request to halt the Sitzer | Burnett case while the defendants wait for the outcome of post-trial motions. Trust me, they’re not of the ‘patience is a virtue’ school.
- The defendants were most certainly bummed by the judge’s decision, probably wishing they could swing a ‘control alt delete’ on the situation.
- The bold move speaks volumes about the justice system’s commitment, which is as solid as a 20-storied condominium – no time for time outs.
- The verdict has potentially serious implications for multiple players, stirring more buzz than a beehive relocation.
- This tale is far from over, and the entertainment supervisors in court can continue their jobs. Pass the popcorn, it’s going to be a hell of a ride.
The Witty Take
So, here’s the skinny. Those defendants are probably sweating bullets right now, but maybe not as intensively as a real estate agent who’s just heard that their prime property is located on a sinkhole-vulnerable area. Mmm, that’s got to hurt worse. It’s a classic case of ‘You can’t always get what you want,’ in the wise words of Mick Jagger. And no, don’t expect any sympathy cards flying your way, not even from the Sears Tower, they’re just jealous of getting less attention these days.
Seriously though, this decision from the judge may be a bitter pill to swallow, but this isn’t a Build-a-Bear Workshop, not everything can be customized according to our wishes. It’s a reality check, even tougher than finding a beachfront property in New York City. This story is starting to look like a dramatic miniseries – lawyers in high stake battles (lawyers obviously played by actors with sparkling teeth), judges calling hard shots, and defendants caught in the web. I don’t know about you, but I am picturing this becoming the next big Netflix series. “Court Chronicles: Sitzer | Burnett,” sounds about right. Let’s not forget to trademark that! At least, yes, for now, hand them defendants a towel while we sit back, relax, and count the days to the next season (er…trial, I mean).
In the end, we are reminded that in real estate, courtrooms, or life, there is one unavoidable absolute: sometimes, you’re the statue and sometimes, you’re the pigeon. For the defendants in the Sitzer | Burnett case, it’s looking distinctly pigeon-y at the moment.
Original article: https://www.inman.com/2024/01/18/court-says-200b-commission-suit-against-nar-must-go-forward/